Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fer's avatar

As a latina, I want you to know that I have picked up on this exact thing while reading center-right newsletters too.

I agree that accusations made against black people of being “racist” against white people is transparently coming from a place of white supremacy.

Like they can’t handle even a little criticism about their systems and biases without getting paranoid en-masse and immediately regressing to censorship. Like you mentioned, white people in the developed west vastly outnumber black people, and it’s only been like 10 years since these topics from black perspectives gained any sort of platform or cultural recognition, yet white conservatives and neocons are losing their minds already.

They just don’t want to hear anything that doesn’t affirm their greatness as ‘the best people of the best color’. No criticisms allowed. Very telling.

There is still something to be said with the question of how useful it is to focus on your own historical, systemic, and cultural oppression, but that doesn’t mean these thoughts should be censored because they make white people uncomfortable.

Glad you wrote this.

Expand full comment
Cinema Timshel's avatar

This is an interesting, if peculiar, essay. Seems to me that that it's functioning as a kind of Rorschach blot here in the comments, but I think people ought to slow down a little and approach it on its own terms. You seem to be moving towards a theory of understanding how power and race work in the context of progressive institutions, and I don't think anybody's adequately articulated that yet.

One element you might be missing though: even if we accept that negative liberal white in-group bias is doing a lot of the heavy lifting around making these milieus so weird about race, if we look at things from another perspective and include sex/gender in our equations, you can arrive at a scenario in which white men are the minority (even if they're a minority over twice the size of black Americans in relation to the racial composition of the US).

White men make up about 30% of the US population, so if you get a context together in which everyone except white men is effectively on the same team, you do arrive at a situation in which it's not particularly difficult for the "everybody else" group to exercise power over the white men group. Even if a majority of the women in positions of influence are white, so long as they're willing to play along with an "everyone except white guys" coalitional movement, this is something that can and does happen.

Still, I think it's important to note that most people simply are not in positions of much influence. So no matter a person's race or gender, they're probably not particularly influential around these issues. To me it sure seems like the identitarian ethos that's taken hold in progressive institutions over the past ten to fifteen years very effectively provides openings for manipulative opportunist types - in a word, people with cluster b tendencies - to seize influence. As a result, these institutions seem to be becoming increasingly corrupt.

I didn't quite approach things from the "white men as a contextual minority" angle in the essay I wrote about arts nonprofits a few months ago, but it's something that's been on my mind.

https://cinematimshel.substack.com/p/ideologically-out-of-line-and-insufficiently

Of course the solution to all of this is real egalitarian multiculturalism on the one hand and a shared American identity on the other, class solidarity across racial and gender lines, and the building of a society organized around the interests of the general population instead of those of the billionaire class.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?